"Loudness"... Why we're where we are.

Tech talk about audio recording and live stage production.
---Hosted by Andrew MacRae & Malcolm Boyce

"Loudness"... Why we're where we are.

Postby Malcolm Boyce » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:34 am

I was having a conversation with a young musician friend, and budding recordist... I thought this exchange says much about why music continues to be produced in the crushed dynamic state that it's progressed to.

Name blocked to protect the innocent.

22:38*****
i record live drums today


22:39Malcolm
Where at?


22:39*****
my house with the stuff i bought


22:40Malcolm
You have to let me hear some stuff.


22:42*****
I will I gotta record a few more parts. It's really hard to get things loud. Like i put one tune on my itunes playlist and its not as loud other songs why is that?


22:43Malcolm
Too much "new" music is too loud, and if that's what you're comparing it too, that's why. Don't worry about "loud" right now, worry about "good".


22:44*****
ok i will then. I just hate going through shuffle on itunes and when my tune is sooo quite and it takes so much away from it


22:46Malcolm
Check this out... I hate to say it but, your generation is part of the problem: http://www.turnmeup.org/


22:47*****
I still focus on the dynamics but it just feels so weak


22:48Malcolm
Make sure you watch that video...


22:48*****
will do


This is one of many people being caught in the same trap. Where do we go from here?
"Once again, it is NEVER the gear that makes a good record.
It just fills Forum pages..." --compasspnt

middleaudio.com
User avatar
Malcolm Boyce
Your Humble Host
 
Posts: 3681
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:07 am
Location: Saint John, NB

Postby Malcolm Boyce » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:16 am

This is one I hadn't heard yet:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =122114058

Old news, but interesting none the less.
"Once again, it is NEVER the gear that makes a good record.
It just fills Forum pages..." --compasspnt

middleaudio.com
User avatar
Malcolm Boyce
Your Humble Host
 
Posts: 3681
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:07 am
Location: Saint John, NB

Postby Christian LeBlanc » Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:30 am

I didn't read the first article, but the second one explained things pretty good.

But yeah, I can relate to that 'volume anxiety' - moreso years ago, when all I had to record with was two tape decks bouncing back and forth.

At this stage, when I'm done a song in Cubase, I export it to a .wav, take it to CoolEdit, and click 'normalize,' and hope all goes well :P

Maybe in the future (or now?!) ipods will just automatically set all songs to the same levels, so volume discrepancies won't really matter anymore?
User avatar
Christian LeBlanc
Silver Member
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:05 pm

Postby macrae11 » Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:39 am

Somedays I think Death Magnetic was the peak of the loudness wars and we're on the downward slope now, but other days, I feel like things are just going to continue on the same track or maybe even get worse.

I think the solution will come from technology, something like what Christian said. When there's a new standard audio format created it will no doubt have metadata of some kind. If it can track the RMS of audio and even out the volume from track to track. This will mostly eliminate the need to strive for the loudest master. I think it will be brought on by demand as consumers become more savvy and learn more about why their old Zep' records are so quite. There's already some demand for this in the realms of TV commercials:
http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story ... S-Congress
User avatar
macrae11
Andrew MacRae
 
Posts: 2128
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:12 pm
Location: Oromocto

Postby Crimson Chameleon » Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:17 am

I read a few of the articles posted and one that I thought was very interesting was the one by Bob Ludwig in regards to Chinese Democracy by Guns n' Roses. He said he did three mastering takes: one with barely any compression to maintain the dynamics, and then two others that had more extreme compression in order to compete with today's "standard." I was amazed (and quite pleased) to hear that Axl Rose liked the good old fashioned mastering job with full dynamics despite a loss of "loudness."

It is also interesting to hear what Tom Petty, John Mellencamp, and that guy T-Bone Burnett are all up to. Maybe we will get more of a return to good old dynamic music in the future.

Perhaps the "loudness" music can be for the masses, whereas there will be nice dynamic music for those of us who want it.

All in all, thanks for the links and articles. There are a lot of articles out there, so this "loudness" problem is obviously a concern, for some at least.
User avatar
Crimson Chameleon
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:29 am
Location: Norton

Postby Cubical » Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:31 am

I am really glad to have read all the articles, links and that Malcolm posted this. I have just started to tip my recording iceberg, and now it all makes sense. I have said the very exact, if not, even worse things without considering the true art that goes into making music, especially the abilty to be as quiet and loud at appropriate times. This all couldn't have come at a better time than now, as I am mixing nre tracks for my new band that we are about to releae. I thought I was done, but now I've gone and marched my arse back to the masters and am undoing what I had done. I can't get over how much better things are already starting to sound. It is like an electronic drumkit: I'm always complaining about cheap ones because they lack dynamics in the drum heads, and I love the cresending and descending aspects of drumming. Now I am hearing this more in my music. We're waging the war on loudness one recording at a time.
"he has more skids in his underwear than you'll find on an Indy 500 raceway folks.."
Cubical
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:47 pm
Location: Saint John, For Now....

Postby Mathieu Benoit » Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:35 am

Cubical wrote: It is like an electronic drumkit: I'm always complaining about cheap ones because they lack dynamics in the drum heads, and I love the cresending and descending aspects of drumming.

That is an analogy that I can certainly get behind. I don't think the point was ever made so clear to me. But then again I'm not a musician, I'm the drummer, so...
"Volume automation takes time. You don't got that kinda time. You could be getting naked with somebody somewhere." -Slipperman

Mathieu Benoit - Fluid Productions
www.fluidaudiogroup.com
www.facebook.com/FluidAudioGroup
User avatar
Mathieu Benoit
Drumwaiter
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:55 pm
Location: Saint John, New Brunswick

Postby jammy jamz » Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:11 am

im actually guilty of crushing some/one of my productions. :oops:

but, in my defence, (ha), it was because my business partners really wanted it to be LOUDER......LOUDER. LLLLLLLLLLOUUUUUUUDER......

im all for dynamics, and crescendos, and diminuendos..

thats why im continually smiling when im in the wings for the symphony shoes. im usually on the side of the contra basses, and cellos.....cuz, thats the way i like it.

not that i would know first hand or anything, but, it would be hard to compete with just even the commercials on the radio....crush crush crush up the volume.

i've never even listened to monster magnet. after load, and then re-load, i just cant bring myself to put it on and listen to it...they were my favorite band for a long time too.
jammy jamz
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:50 pm

Postby Cubical » Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:25 am

I think that the Radio and commerical media nwill be difficult, if not impossible to overcome. I wouldn't want to assume, but I would hope that radio jockeys are adjusting volumes appropriately for each track. Then again, it seems commercial radio/ mainstream media are in the habit of making everything alittle "eaier" on everybody; "set it and forget it" anyone? C98, the WAVE, and others are now preprogramming all music played on the air! It is funny to look in at the C94 building on King street. I don't see any CDs/records in there, do you? That's a whole differnt discussion but I do think that Loudness has and will continue to go hand in hand with the seemingly more common dumbed'down, poorly written and produced music that occupies the top spots in new music at the present.
"he has more skids in his underwear than you'll find on an Indy 500 raceway folks.."
Cubical
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:47 pm
Location: Saint John, For Now....

Postby Mathieu Benoit » Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:47 am

They take mp3s actually, I recently found out. (If you give them a CD you run the risk of only hearing things in the right side... :-P) I'm assuming this has been the case for a while. That doesn't make a whole lot of difference. I personally can't tell the difference between a 44.1/16 wav and a 320kbit MP3.

The problem is that everybody feels that if they are louder they will be more noticeable or relavent. It's like having an argument where you figure if you can over power the opposition in volume then your lack of logic may be seem as insight. Well it doesn't translate that way. Just liek with music, the music isn't necessarily better, just more exhausting.
"Volume automation takes time. You don't got that kinda time. You could be getting naked with somebody somewhere." -Slipperman

Mathieu Benoit - Fluid Productions
www.fluidaudiogroup.com
www.facebook.com/FluidAudioGroup
User avatar
Mathieu Benoit
Drumwaiter
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:55 pm
Location: Saint John, New Brunswick


Return to Sounds Good...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron